Atin Ito First Filipino Community Newspaper in Ontario
MANILA, Philippines — Moves by the Philippine National Police to punish online content creators allegedly spreading disinformation to “destabilize” the Marcos administration should be viewed with caution due to the police’s history of interfering with free speech, according to media watchdog Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR).
CMFR executive director Melinda Quintos De Jesus said that the PNP’s crackdown on vloggers it accuses of spreading false information “presents the police as an arbiter of free expression” and a threat to the public’s freedom of speech and expression — rights protected by the 1987 Constitution.
“The report about the police’s intent to interfere with the media and the public forum creates a climate of fear. The PNP statement suggests that any police officer can interpret as destabilizing what an individual or group says in a political discussion on any media platform,” De Jesus said.
Amid fresh denials by the country’s security forces that they recently backed a destabilization plot against the president, PNP chief Benjamin Acorda has taken exception with one vlogger’s use of his face in a video implying that the PNP and the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) have called for the president’s resignation.
Leaders of both the PNP and AFP have denied supporting a destabilization plan against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., with PNP spokesperson Col. Jean Fajardo saying that while content creators have the right to free speech, “we are also asking them to spare the PNP.”
The PNP said that it will file criminal complaints against the vloggers and ask social media companies Facebook and YouTube to remove the “fake” destabilization plot videos, Fajardo said on Saturday.
De Jesus said that the police must go through the formal judicial process if it has evidence that a crime has been committed.
“For a law enforcement agency to be involved in imposing limits to free expression is misuse or abuse of state power,” she added.
“The involvement of the PNP in this issue is disturbing, to say the least. It recalls dark periods in our history when indeed the police with the military were at the forefront as guardians of a dictatorial regime,” the CMFR executive director added.
PNP targets false info peddler
On Monday, Acorda filed a complaint against a certain Johnny Lacsamana Macanas who uploaded a video on his YouTube channel “The General’s Opinion” on December 29 featuring a thumbnail with the face of Acorda.
The title of Macanas’ video used to read: “Good News!AFP PNP GENERALS CONVINCING PBBM to RESIGN?,” but this has since been changed to “DUMARAMI TAO CONVINCING PBBM TO DO RIGHT THING?” The thumbnail has also been replaced with the face of Macanas.
In the past, the PNP’s regional and provincial offices have openly red-tagged progressive groups and legitimate news organizations — a practice that endangers their safety and has been the prelude to several cases of enforced disappearances and even killings.
In 2022, alternative news site Kodao Productions reported the Baguio City police’s red-tagging of journalists as part of their counterinsurgency campaign.
Facebook pages of certain PNP offices have also been observed spreading questionable and downright incorrect narratives, including the false claim that former senator Benigno Aquino Jr. was a member of the Communist Party of the Philippines – New People’s Army. — Cristina Chi
*****
Credit belongs to : www.philstar.com
